Interview with Thomas H. Moorer, 1981
Summary
Thomas H. Moorer was an Admiral in the United States Navy. During the Vietnam War, he was the Chief of Naval Operations from 1967 – 1970, and served as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1970–1974. Admiral Moorer begins by talking about the events surrounding the Tonkin Gulf Incidents, and his belief that there was in fact two separate incidents. He then discusses the incursions into Cambodia to search for the COSVN headquarters, and the debate within the Defense Department over whether or not the US should push into Cambodia. He also briefly describes the failed attempt to destroy the Ho Chi Minh Trail in Laos, the 1972 Spring Offensive, and the decision to mine Hai Phong harbor, despite worries of drawing the Soviets into the war. Admiral Moorer then details the 1972 “Christmas Bombing” of Hanoi, why it was necessary, and why it was effective. He finally comments on the limitations of the Vietnamization plan.
Topics
United States--History, Military--20th century, Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Campaigns--Cambodia, Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Prisoners and prisons, American, Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Mass media and the war, Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Aerial operations, American, Bombing, Aerial Vietnam, Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Atrocities, Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Public opinion, Military ethics, Military assistance, American, Logistics, Treaties, Vietnam War, 1961-1975--Personal narratives, American, Presidents--Messages, Strategy, Vietnam War, 1961-197--Campaigns--Laos
Annotations
public annotations (0)
Transcript
The Tonkin Gulf Incidents
VIETNAM
ADM. MOORER
SR #2824
T 876
Picture Roll 840. Sound Roll 2824. Admiral Moorer. Take one.
Clapstick.
ADM. MOORER
SR #2824
T 876
Picture Roll 840. Sound Roll 2824. Admiral Moorer. Take one.
Clapstick.
Interviewer:
Could
you ah, tell us about the Tonkin Gulf Incident? What happened – what were the ships
the American Maddox and Turner Joy – doing there, and how did
that incident unfold?
Moorer:
Well,
as you recall the Tonkin
Gulf Incident occurred in ah, August of
1964, at which time I was Commander in
Chief of the Pacific Fleet. So I am ah, well aware of the
details of that operation. The Maddox was
engaged in what we called a peripheral reconnaissance. This meant that
the ship was simply to ah, stay in international waters but to cruise in
the Tonkin Gulf ah, and to
pick up such information in intelligence as was ah, existed at the time.
The
ah, Maddox was engaged in ah, this ah,
operation. And I think she was ah, steaming north along the coast of ah,
ah, North Vietnam somewhere off ah, the ah, east of ah, Vinh, when ah, she was ah, attacked.
Now
we ah, were aware that this was a possibility. As a matter of fact, the
North Vietnamese issued orders ah, which said, as far as I recall ah,
"get ready to make war," was the English translation of their message.
And ah, so ah, there's no question about the fact that the Maddox was attacked.
Ah,
as you know ah, they actually had ah, machine gun bullets impact on the
ship, and the allegations that were made subsequently, that the ship was
engaged in some kind of ah, ah, operation or joint operation with the
South Vietnamese, or that she was inside territorial waters, or that she
was violating international law in any way is just pure nonsense.
Interviewer:
Was
there a second
incident the Turner Joy? What
happened with the second
incident?
Moorer:
Yes, in
the second
incident, of course ah, we had reinforced the Maddox with the Turner Joy and um, the ah, the aircraft carrier down there
was also supplying ah, air support over head when the torpedo boats from
ah, Vinh made a second attack ah,
in that area.
Now
this was a night attack, and ah, ah, if you look at the history of night
naval engagements, you'll find out that no two people see the same thing
during ah, such confusion and such an uproar. And of course, as a result
ah, there were many, stories concocted, and ah, allegedly some people
said one thing, and some people said another, and I'm sure they did.
And, but in all honesty.
And
so this whole incident was just ah, built up, and matter of fact it got
into the Congress, and ah,
Senator Fulbright
got into the act, and of course ah, after it was over I directed a full
investigation to be conducted by ah, ah, Vice Admiral Roy Johnson, who at that
time was ah, ah, Commander of the Seventh Fleet who was directly ah, in
control of this particular operation.
And
of course, as I expected, he ah, found that none of these allegations
that were ah, published ah, frequently in the paper, and ah, were thrown
about on the halls of Congress ah, were true.
Interviewer:
Well,
could you just be a little precise on the second incident – was there a
second
incident, did it really take place?
Moorer:
Yes.
There was definitely a separate, separate ah, incident.
Interviewer:
Would
you repeat that?
Moorer:
I say
yes, there was definitely a second incident, and ah, when they ah, the
torpedo boats, which was as you recall, the only type of naval craft
that the North Vietnamese had, again made ah, a high speed approach and
attack on ah, these two ships.
Interviewer:
One
more point about this, the, uhm, bombing – the air bombing that took
place that was triggered by the Tonkin Gulf Incident – was there a contingency
plan for that – had that been prepared in advance – or did you just
organize that on the spur of the moment?
Moorer:
Well,
we organized that as we do all bombing ah, attacks on the spur of the
moment. Ah, the ah, the guidance that was given, of course, was that ah,
we were to ah, attack the torpedo boat ah, base at Vinh and the fuel storage, which ah, supplied
the ah, torpedo boats.
Ah,
ah, of course, at that time ah, all instructions in the greatest detail
were coming from Washington, even as to how many bombs to put on each
wing of the airplane. But ah, in this case the ah, ah, objective, I
guess was to ah, indicate that there was no attack on North Vietnam
proper, only against ah, those elements that were involved in the
attack.
The Cambodian Incursions and their rationale
Interviewer:
I'd
like to go on now to the, uhm, Cambodian incursion. Could you describe your role in the
Cambodian incursion – how
it was planned, what it was supposed to achieve ah, – did you really
intend to destroy the COSVN, the headquarters of the South Vietnamese
communists? And also, what were President Nixon's attitudes at that time, as you
recall?
Moorer:
Well,
of course, you've got to remember that ah, before this particular ah,
operation took place, that ah...
Interviewer:
Sorry, could you just repeat that it was the Cambodian incursion?
Moorer:
Ah, I
say you have to remember before the Cambodian incursion took place, ah, we were having ah, ah,
discussions as to how much logistic support was being supplied to the
North Vietnamese and the Viet
Cong ah, through the ah, Cambodian ah, port. And ah, which, at that time was called
Sihanoukville. And of
course, many of the people, including Mr. McNamara ah, ah, stood fast on this statement
that there was no supplies coming, uh, from, uh, Sihanoukville.
In
addition to that ah, the North Vietnamese, and ah, had ah, created what
we called sanctuaries, which were nothing more than ah, ah, rest camps
and supply bases ah, from which they were organizing ah, forays into
South Vietnam, and then after the action was ah, over, or if the action
got too ah, difficult for them, they would immediately retire back into
this sanctuary, and, of course, could not be followed.
Ah,
many people ah, ah, of course ah, attacked this ah, Cambodian incursion on the
grounds that it was widening the war ah, that we had violated the
sovereignty of Sihanouk – the
facts were that Sihanouk was
not allowed by the North Vietnamese to visit that part of his country.
And I think it’s ah, well established ah, in international law that if a
ah, country permits a, a second country to use its sovereign territory
to attack a third country, then this third country ah, is absolutely ah,
within its rights to ah, ah, to ah, attack ah, such bases as the North
Vietnamese had.
Now
ah, as we began to concern ourselves about the United States casualties,
which the North Vietnamese were able to inflict by virtue of making use
of these sanctuaries, well of course, we began to ah, take a look at
what kind of operation we could ah, mount in order to stop it. Ah, ah,
we gave serious consideration to permitting the South Vietnamese only to
go into Cambodia. But it was
quite clear that at that point in their training ah, the South
Vietnamese did not have the capability.
In
the meantime ah, we, of course, were working up what our policy was
going to be with respect to Cambodia. And so as far as my personal ah, involvement in it ah,
I remember distinctly this – one evening ah, we had ah, ah, written and
developed the policy that the United States was going to ah, utilize
with respect to Cambodia. At
that time I was not Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but I was Acting Chairman,
because ah, General Wheeler was in the hospital.
And, so I was ah, sent for ah, with orders to ah, be in the White
House, I believe it was at 6:00 in the morning. And when I arrived I ah,
looked out into the Rose Garden and ah, President Nixon was coming into the
Oval Office with a ah, copy of the New York
Times ah, in his hand, and he was ah, very much upset and
properly so, because a copy of the message we had written the evening
before was in the right hand column of the front page under Bill Beecher's by line,
verbatim. Ah, and it was a top secret, eyes only message.
And
so those were the conditions under which ah, we were operating in those
days because there were ah, people who were willing to sacrifice the
interest of the United States for one reason or another. And, I'm sure
they wanted to make certain that the ah, federal government didn't
function at all.
In
any event, we ah, at that point had another discussion about the
operation and the decision was made to use our US troops. And, however,
that we would only make a, a limited incursion to a distance which ah,
ah, President Nixon ah,
ultimately stated in a press conference of ah, twenty miles.
Well of course, that caused ah, quite a bit of ah, difficulty because
ah, ah, the press, as a rule, are not very sharp at converting miles
into kilometers, which they use in Cambodia, so they're always sending back press releases ah,
sometimes talking about miles and sometimes talking about kilometers – I
never thought they knew the difference.
But
ah, ah, we did conduct the operation. It was very successful, and
getting back to my comment about Sihanoukville, we did find that ah, some, uh, 20,000 tons of
supplies had come through the Cambodian port and for that matter were trucked up to the
sanctuaries by Sihanouk's
trucks – his own army trucks. And so ah, the point is that they
ah..
Interviewer:
Excuse me, we’ve run out of...
Camera Roll #841 coming up, 841. Picture Roll 841, Admiral Moorer.
Take two. Clapstick.
Moorer:
Going
back to my comments, going back to my comment concerning ah, the
introduction of supplies through Sihanoukville, the facts were that ah, we found ah, complete
evidence that ah, some 20,000 tons of supplies had come up through Cambodia and, for that matter,
had been trucked up there by ah, ah, trucks of the Cambodian army ah, under the
command of Sihanouk. So there
was no question about the fact that Sihanouk was aiding and abetting ah, the North Vietnamese.
And
so ah, based on any international law, the United States was totally and
completely justified in this. Throughout this entire operation ah, of
course, President Nixon
was ah, very firm. He recognized that ah, casualties ah, to US forces
were, ah, much higher than they would be if it wasn't for the fact that
the North Vietnamese were using Cambodia as a base, and ah, there had been ah, comments
about that ah, subsequently.
But
the facts are that ah, if ah, President Nixon had not taken the action he did ah, when
he did it, there would be ah, many ah, American boy that's alive and a
useful citizen today that would be in Arlington instead. And so ah, the surprising
thing about the Cambodian
operation is ah, the question I have is why didn't we do it
sooner?
Interviewer:
You
said there were people who were against the operation – inside the Pentagon.
Moorer:
Well
I think ah, that whole ah, ah, attitude in the, ah, ah, country at
large, in the ah, both the legislative and executive branches of the
government, and so on, were ah, adverse ah, to the operation, because as
you recall, one of the ah, guidelines laid down by President Johnson was, "we seek no
wider wars." So there was, there were all kinds of complaints that this
was, in fact, widening the war, when in fact ah, the ah, whole purpose
of it was to protect the lives of American boys.
And
I must say that throughout this entire Vietnam operation ah, I was
appalled at the fact that so many people in and out of the government,
and certainly I would put the media at the top of the list, seemed far
more concerned about the lives of the people in Southeast Asia than they
were the lives of the young men that were fighting for their country.
Let
me give you an example of this. For instance, when I was ah, describing
the torture that was being inflicted on the POW's in ah, in North
Vietnam I've actually had the American citizens tell me, "Well it serves
them right – they had no business volunteering."
So
this is just indicative of the whole attitude. So the many people in the
President's cabinet. And ah, many of his advisors, and for that matter
many in the Congress that
thought we should not have conducted the Cambodian incursion.
Appraisal of Operation Lam Son 719
Interviewer:
I
just want to go onto the Lam Son Operation – Lamson 719, which was the South
Vietnamese thrust into Laos in
February of 1971. Do you look at this as
the first test of Vietnamization, and what was the American role in
supporting the Vietnamese doing, South Vietnamese doing that?
Moorer:
Well
so far as the Lamson
7l9 ah, was concerned, it was, in fact, the ah, ah, first ah,
major operation ah, outside of, ah, ah, Vietnam, South Vietnam that was
conducted under their command. And of course, the purpose of the ah,
operation was to cut the Ho
Chi Minh Trail, which was being used by the North Vietnamese
to supply practically all of the operations in South Vietnam.
Ah,
the American role was primarily in the form of ah, air support and ah,
logistic support ah, ah, within South Vietnam up to the ah, Laotian border. Ah, the ah, ah,
operation, of course ah, did finally succeed in reaching ah, Tchepone.
It
ah, was not ah, successful as we ah, had ah, hoped in the sense that the
ah, ah, South Vietnamese of course ah, subsequently withdrew after they
had, ah, reached the objective. But I believe when one bears in mind
that the French, for instance,
took care to see that the Vietnamese and the Cambodians too, for that matter, gained ah, very
little experience in the command role ah, that ah, they did ah, do ah,
ah, a fairly good job.
Interviewer:
Were
you disappointed by the ah, uhm, results of that operation?
Moorer:
Well
I'd hoped that ah, you know ah, that we would have been able to
permanently cut the Ho Chi
Minh Trail. And of course there again, there were many
restraints ah, placed upon us. Ah, had we been allowed to attack all of
North Vietnam while that operation was taking place, then I think the
results would have been different.
But
the North Vietnamese were able to bring down ah, very large numbers of
reinforcements, and keep feeding them into ah, the ah, through the
passes into ah, the ah, Tchepone area.
The Spring Offensive and its aftermath
Interviewer:
I'd
like to go on now to the, Hanoi’s
1972
Spring Offensive. When
you look back on that what do you think the objective of the Communists
was – it really to take all of South Vietnam? And what was the change in
their approach – you had mentioned that they were using now for the
first time Soviet tanks and artillery, and ah, could you describe the
importance of US air support to the South Vietnamese in your statement
about inching northward.
Moorer:
Well
ah, so far as the ah, North Vietnamese offensive in ah, 1972 was concerned, as you recall, it was ah,
30 March when they crossed the DMZ in rather large numbers
ah, coming down Highway One, which ah, was right along the coastline ah,
the east coastline of South Vietnam. We had ah, anticipated that.
As
a matter of fact, it was ah, ah, obvious to us that we had seen a large
concentration of ah, North Vietnamese tanks around ah, ah, Bot
Lat, which was just
north of the DMZ. And here
again, you have one of these restraints in the sense that ah, ah, the
obvious thing to do with any kind of prudent military action would have
been to clean those tanks out right then and there.
But
we were not allowed to do that because ah, ah, the ah, political
reasoning was that we had to wait until ah, the North Vietnamese
violated ah, the agreement and crossed the DMZ. So, in effect, we had to give them a
running start. Ah, they waited for some ah, foggy morning, and across
they came. Ah, and ah, as you recall, they did ah, penetrate down into a
certain part of the ah, ah, military region one, I think, to the Cua
Viet River, about.
We
ah, at that point, President Nixon, of course ah, ah, became ah, ah, very concerned. And
we initiated what was called Linebacker II, which consisted of ah, large scale ah,
attacks against ah, transportation and ah, logistics ah, supplies and
bases ah, that were ah, being used to ah, to support this operation
coming down through the South.
In
addition to that, we ah, sent ah, additional aircraft carriers,
additional destroyers, and additional tactical aircraft into ah, Thailand, and into the Tonkin Gulf. Ah, and began to
conduct rather active ah, ah, operations.
On
ah, May the 1st, I was ah, called by the
President and ah, he ah, questioned me about the, ah, prospects of
mining Hai Phong Harbor. And
ah, which I told him we were already ready, already for that, as a
matter of fact, for the first time I had recommended it, and I
personally made the plan myself when I was Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet eight years before.
So ah, there was no planning necessary. We already had the plan.
Ah,
and consequently ah, ah, his next requirement was to ah, ah, ask me ah,
can ah, we do this without it leaking? Because I would like to be on
the, announcing it to the nation on tv at the same instant that the
bombs were falling, bearing in mind that there's a twelve hour
difference between Washington and ah, the ah, ah, North Vietnam, you
see, that meant that if we drop the mines at 9:00 in the morning, then
he would go on tv at 9:00 in the evening ah, which he did.
We
did manage to keep it absolutely secret. And ah, the reason we were able
to that is we did not permit any members of the press to board our
ships. And so there was no way they could find out about it. And ah,
consequently, it was ah, ah, conducted without anyone being aware of it.
I
might ah, comment on that particular operation because ah, I had spent
ah, much time thinking about it, At the time we had conducted that
operation on 8 May 1972 ah, we were
flying 1,000 sorties in ah, ah, Southeast Asia, overall, per day. We took about twenty-six
aircraft off of one aircraft carrier, and they were airborne about an
hour and a half, and we mined Hai
Phong Harbor, and not one ship entered or left ah, that
Harbor until we, ourselves, removed the mines. No one person was hurt,
or in any way, and ah, consequently ah, that was again an operation that
should have been conducted in 1974 if we really
meant to go to war.
VIETNAM
T 876
SR #2825
ADM. MOORER
Picture roll 842. Sound 2825. Admiral Moorer. Take three.
T 876
SR #2825
ADM. MOORER
Picture roll 842. Sound 2825. Admiral Moorer. Take three.
Moorer:
At
the time of the mining of Hai
Phong Harbor ah, we were conducting ah 1000 sorties per day in
Southeast Asia. Ah,
for the mining operation we took only twenty-six aircraft and one
aircraft carrier and ah, not one ship ah, departed or entered Hai Phong ah, subsequent to the
mining.
It's only too bad we did not ah, get permission as the military
commanders tried to do over and over to ah, mine that harbor ah, ah, in
1964. Because that would have made a
significant difference in the outcome of the war.
Now,
related to that, of course, is the aircraft bombings. So many people
suggest that the bombing ah, had no effect. Well, the facts were, of
course, that ah, a very large part of the supplies were brought in by
ship because the ships had absolute free entrance and this meant that
the ah, ah, load placed on the railroad, for instance, coming in from
China was ah, very light - ah, some, something like ah, ten ah, fifteen
percent of their total capacity. So, they only ran at night and hid in
the tunnels in the daytime.
The
ah, overall point here is that when ah, a military operation is laid on
to attack transportation ah, it will not be effective unless all
elements of that transportation are attacked, and if you impose all
kinds of political restraints at the same time ah, then ah, you, of
course, are ah, not ah, able to get full benefit of what the ah,
military operation can ah, ah, you know, perform.
Interviewer:
Could
you recall briefly the meeting on May 8th
that you had with Senators Fulbright and Mansfield after the president, Describe that scene in which
the president left you to deal with them.
Moorer:
Yes.
Ah, at the ah, time that the ah, president ah, ah, was preparing to
announce to the ah, ah, was preparing to announce to the people of the
United States and the world at large that we were, in fact, conducting
this mining operation ah, ah, a decision was made to invite to the White
House the leaders ah, in the Congress from ah, both ah, sides of the house so to speak,
which included ah, ah, among other people Senators Mansfield, Fulbright; Senator
Stennis and ah,
several others.
I
ah, of course, was assigned ah, the task of ah, briefing these gentlemen
and the president ah, after having introduced me ah, departed in order
to prepare for his ah, tv announcement. Ah, I got very little ah,
reaction from this particular high-level audience, although ah, I did
observe Senator Fulbright and Mansfield shaking their heads ah, ah, quite a bit ah, over
the thought because here again was this ah, concern that this would ah,
ah, quote "widen the war" unquote, and that ah, the Soviets would
immediately dash down to the Tonkin Gulf and ah, sweep the mines.
I'll tell you an ah, interesting ah, ah, aftermath of this. As a matter
of fact, the Soviets did
send two small minesweepers from Vladivostok headed ah, south and the hand-wringers in
Washington ah, were ah, ah, very concerned that here was the beginning
of the ah, Soviets'
interference.
I
ah, told them that in my opinion the Soviet minesweepers were set to going over to what
is now Bangladesh at Chittagong where the Pakistanis had mined ah, the
area during the India/Pakistan war that they had no
intention of trying to sweep the kinds of mines that we had put in Hai Phong Harbor. And ah, this
is exactly what happened. When those two little minesweepers ah, ah,
passed ah, south of the Tonkin
Gulf they ah, just kept right on going and wound up in Chittagong. But everyone ah
was quite concerned you know that this was ah, widening the war that the
Russians were going
to get involved in it.
Enforcement of the Paris talks and ethical reasoning regarding the Christmas Bombings
Interviewer:
Let's
go on to the Christmas Bombing
of 1972. You said there was a lot of
controversy. I wonder if you could describe how that affected you, but
before that what was the purpose of the Christmas Bombing? What were the targets and I
wish you'd get (clears throat) if you could get into the issue of the
fact that some bombs did fall here in on residential areas and so forth,
why did that happen?
Moorer:
I
think that the ah, Christmas
Bombing of ah, of ah, 1972 has ah,
ah, been the victim of more ah, false information than almost any part
of that war. I think one must go back to the time when ah, ah, Dr. Kissinger made his
speech ah, wherein he reported “peace is at hand” in October of ah, ah,
1972 and ah, ah, the agreement ah, had
ah, more or less been assigned with North Vietnam ah, under the auspices
of their ah, negotiator Le Duc
Tho.
And
ah, ah, we were watching very carefully to see what the ah, North
Vietnamese were going to do and they, it was obvious that they had no
intention of ah, slowing the tempo of their supply effort ah, so far as
pushing supplies down south.
Ah,
You've got to also bear in mind that we in the Vietnamization Program
had ah, withdrawn a very large number of troops ah, from Vietnam. I
think perhaps we are the only country in the world that ever withdrew
troops while the fighting was still taking place, but nevertheless ah,
ah, this we did, and of course we were getting down to the point where
we could not afford to withdraw every American and for all practical
purposes simply de-desert those fine young men that were tortured and
held prisoned in ah, North Vietnam.
And, so ah, I had ah, been working with ah, a small part of my staff
ah, in ah, order to ah, generate or plan an operation which would ah,
ah, get the attention of the North Vietnamese. Because I felt that they
were nothing more than ah, revolutionaries, that they only understood
just one thing, and that was brute force, and that unless you presented
them with this problem ah, you could negotiate forever, and you would
never get them to ah, agree. Or even if they agreed, they wouldn't
comply.
Well, I had been to a NATO meeting,
and was flying back to Washington when I received a message that the ah, President
Nixon wanted to see
me ah, and, at Camp David
ah, as soon as I, arrived. When I arrived I joined ah, Deputy Secretary
of Defense, Ken Rush and
we flew together to Camp
David, and ah, discussed with the President, "what do we do now?
We've had ah, ah, this agreement, we thought peace was at hand ah, it's
not here yet, the North Vietnamese are violating it, our POW's are still
in captivity, how do we get 'em out?"
And
ah, so ah, it was my position ah, which I had taken all along, again
that only through brute force could you force the North Vietnamese to
get the word as to what was ah, what the facts of life really were, if
they did continue to hold them. So consequently, ah, the President
agreed that we should ah, lay on ah, a very heavy strike, this time
using the B-52s as well as the tactical aircraft. Ah, part of that time
we used the B-52s very sparingly in ah, North Vietnam.
Ah,
I went back to ah, my office and we began to work ah, in the details of
this operation. And ah, as I recalled ah, it began on the ah, 18th of December ah, in 1972.
As
one might ah, expect in an operation of that kind, the ah, aircraft
losses are always ah, higher the first day and the second day, and so
on, than they are later on because ah, ah, the ah, air defenses at that
time, are in ah, first class shape. Whereas they suffer from the impact
of the bombing and ah, also from mechanical failure, and from ammunition
supply, and so the ah, the ah, capability of the ah, North Vietnamese to
shoot down our aircraft, um, degraded rather rapidly.
As
a matter of fact, we could hear them on the radio ah, complaining
bitterly that in some cases ah, some of their launches had no ah,
ammunition. And so the last two days of the operation ah, we suffered no
losses at all, and could've continued with impunity ah, subsequent to
that time in my view, without losing any aircraft of ah, consequence.
So
far as a target is concerned, again ah, the ah, idea was ah, to ah,
destroy those ah, ah, facilities ah, in terms of warehouses, supplies,
command and control stations, the missile assembly points ah, that ah,
were again ah, allowing or enabling the North Vietnamese to continue
their operations in South Vietnam and to continue to violate the very
solemn agreement that they had already made with ah, ah, Dr. Kissinger.
So
ah, we ah, selected targets of this kind, and, of course, you've got to
ah, ah, realize that um, when ah, ah, an operation of that size takes
place, that ah, sooner or later you might have a stray bomb or so. And
ah, ah, we, however ah, I think no other authority than Walter Cronkite,
himself, visited the area shortly thereafter and said that he was amazed
at the accuracy ah, of the ah, bombing. We certainly ah, in no sense,
ah, laid on what ah, we'd been accused of ah...
Interviewer:
We've run
out of film.
Okay, we're switching to Pix Roll #843.
Pix Roll #843.
Admiral Moorer.
Take four.
Clapstick.
Pix Roll #843.
Admiral Moorer.
Take four.
Clapstick.
Moorer:
The
targets selected in the 1972
Christmas Bombing consisted
of...
Interviewer:
Start
one more time.
Moorer:
The
targets selected in the 1972 ah, Christmas Bombing consisted
of entirely of military targets. Ah, for instance ah, they would ah, ah,
consist of ah, warehouses ah, command and control stations ah, missile
sites, ammunition storage, communications sites ah, things of that kind.
Ah, the ah, the accusation that we were conducting ah, carpet bombing,
of course, is ah, ah, absolutely false.
For
that matter, had we ah, conducted carpet bombing ah, think that there
wouldn't be a Hanoi today. And
so, the fact that there is a Hanoi is proof positive that there was no ah, ah, carpet
bombing.
And
ah, in addition to that, I think one of the ah, most ah, ah, unhappy
aspects for me associated with that particular operation was a fact that
ah, we were accused of, in ah, the local papers, who were doing nothing
more than repeating what Hanoi
says of ah, killing our own POW's. And ah, I had many calls from the
mothers and from the fathers ah, of these young men ah, ah, and ah,
asking why we were doing this ah, when in fact, we knew where all the
POW's were, and as you know they're all back now and none of 'em were
touched. And so I will never be able to understand, as long as I live,
why, the uh, media was willing to accept a flat statement from an enemy
and ah, turn what was a very unhappy Christmas into a miserable
Christmas for the mothers and fathers, wives and children of these boys
that were being held in ah, ah, North Vietnam.
There were, of course, as I said ah, ah, occasion when a bomb or two
ah, ah, went ah, astray, and uh, I think one corner of one hospital was
hit. But ah, that was certainly ah, in any sense targeted. And I defy
anyone to conduct an operation like that and have ah, no instance of
that kind.
As
a matter of fact, in World War II
no one even give a, gave a ah, any thought to ah, ah, such things ah,
Now ah, I think it's ah, interesting to ah, point out that ah, two
things. In the first place, the losses of aircraft ah, ah, of the B-52
aircraft, in particular, were ah, precisely as we anticipated. I had uh,
reported, uh, to the Secretary of Defense and the President that we
would lose ah, 2% of the sorties.
As
a matter of fact, I think there were seven hundred and uh, forty
sorties, and we lost fifteen B-52's. However ah, many of them ah,
recovered outside of ah, North Vietnam. So ah, ah, we did not ah, have
the crews come down in ah, North Vietnamese ah, area.
Ah,
the second point I'd like to make is that when ah, ah, at the time of
Christmas ah, President Nixon ah, directed that there would be no bombing conducted ah,
on Christmas Day. Well, since there was a
twelve hour ah, ah, time difference, that meant that there was
thirty-six hours during which we did not conduct any bombings, and this
did give the ah, North Vietnamese and opportunity to ah, repair some of
their anti-aircraft ah, facilities, and so on.
One
of the interesting things about this operation was that the North ah,
Vietnamese fighters payed a played a very minor part. As a matter of
fact, it was just as if they didn't have any. Whereas they did have ah,
many very fine fighters.
And ah, with respect to restraints, I think the public should know that
ah, ah, in an effort not to widen the war, and in any way endanger
either a Chinese or, or a Soviet ah, aircraft, we
were never allowed to attack the Phuc
Yen Airfield just outside of Hanoi. Well, of course, the North Vietnamese are not stupid,
and they caught onto this. And they kept their best fighters in this ah,
field, and here is another incident of where we had ah, sanctuary for
enemy forces that we created ourselves.
Interviewer:
What
about the story of some of the B-52 pilots being reluctant to go on
these missions?
Moorer:
Of
all the ah, B-52 pilots that ah, went on the ah, mission, only one
refused to go. And as is the ah, ah, practice of the media these days,
he was a hero ah, and ah, the others were doing what they shouldn't have
been doing. Those that, uh, the real heroes were never mentioned and
this one individual was played up ah, ah, several, ah, for several ah,
editions of the paper.
Interviewer:
Could
you recall some of your conversation with President Nixon at this particular
time? What was his mood? And how did he convey his mood to you in these
conversations?
Moorer:
Well,
I, I think that ah, President Nixon ah, deserves a tremendous amount of credit for his ah,
staunch way in which he carried this out despite the fact that, um,
many, many ah, uh, people were ah, ah, some in his immediate staff were
advising him to stop it, or to to call a halt to it, so on.
But
ah, as a matter of fact ah, one ah, ah evening, during the time this
operation was taking place ah, he invited me to the White House for, a
dinner. And ah, I, I felt that ah, my, ah, ah, contacts with him were
uh, uh, very, very uh, straight forward. And I, I think that, uh, every
time I saw him he was, uh, what so many people say "gung ho" to ah, ah,
proceed, whether he was determined to proceed with the operation and get
the POW's back.
And
as a matter of fact, after it was all over ah, sometime in January he called me over to the White House
and ah, ah, we discussed the whole operation and he was ah, very
complimentary and very ah, ah, appreciative of ah, the way the operation
had been conducted.
I'd
like to point out to you that the day after ah, Christmas ah, we
conducted an operation involving 100 B-52's and about 350 tactical
aircraft over Hanoi and Hai Phong in a very limited
time – less than an hour. I don't think any other military service in
the world could've done that. And this required the most ah, perfect ah,
cooperation and coordination between the Air Force and the US Navy, uh, aircraft ah, from the ah, aircraft carriers. It
was just ah, from a professional point of view it was a, total
perfection.
Political and military errors of the Vietnam War
Interviewer:
Let's
go on to this last segment study.
Maybe
your meter’s going.
Moorer:
Oh,
yes,
Take five is coming up.
Mark it.
Take five.
Clapstick.
Mark it.
Take five.
Clapstick.
Moorer:
There's been ah, much discussion of Vietnamization. And many have
thought that it would have been more effective if Vietnamization had ah,
ah, started before it actually before it actually did. Ah, the facts
were, as I have mentioned before ah, the South Vietnamese simply did not
have ah, qualified leaders to take over a military operation ah, in ah,
of the kind that was necessary in order ah, withstand the attacks of the
professional ah, North Vietnamese troops.
One
must remember that the North Vietnamese, under Ho Chi Minh, had been fighting ah, first the
French, then the Japanese, then the French again, and now the
Americans. And they were professionals in every sense. Ah, the South
Vietnamese, on the other hand, were ah, primarily those ah, that were
ah, more or less, uh, under the command of the French, and had ah, never had an opportunity to
uh, develop leadership.
However, Vietnamization or no Vietnamization, the big mistake made ah,
in my opinion, by the United States was that, uh, such troops as we
landed into Vietnam should have been landed north of the DMZ and not south of the
DMZ. Because, in that
way we could've completely cut off the Ho Chi Minh Trail at the very outset.
And
furthermore, it would've made the ah, ah, assignment of the young
captains and lieutenants in the Marine Corps, and in the ah, ah, ah, Army so much ah, easier in the sense that they
would've known then, that ah, every ah, individual they saw was an
enemy. In other words ah, you would not had a, the circumstance that was
encountered in the My
Lai ah, episode.
Because there are many, many, again, young Americans dead because they
would continually admonish, "Now don't shoot, because you might kill a
friend." And we had women with hand grenades in their brassieres, and in
their babies diapers, and I personally was in ah, ah, South Vietnam when
ah, two Marines were trying to
ah, teach some youngsters how to play volleyball, and one of 'em pulled
a hand grenade out of his pocket and killed both of 'em.
So
ah, had we had our troops in North Vietnam instead of South Vietnam
without having two forces that look exactly alike, they all had on ah,
black ah, clothes, and they all were ah, Vietnamese. And we, and so ah,
that, to me, was the big mistake we made. Not going into North Vietnam.
But, uh, if you recall that President Johnson stated three things, that I think all
of which, uh, uh, got us into quite a bit of trouble. He said we will
not invade North Vietnam. He said we seek no wider war, and that
accounted for Phuc Yen
Airfield being a sanctuary. And finally, he said, "We will not overthrow
Ho Chi Minh."
Well, the only way, the only reason to go to war, at any time, uh, is
to overthrow a government that's doing something you don't like. And if
you announce at the outset that you are not going to overthrow the
government, then, so far as I’m concerned ah, you should come home
immediately.
Interviewer:
Admiral, you have a reputation for salty language. Could you use a
little salty language and tell us, looking back, do you think you were
fighting with your hands tied behind your backs?
[Technical discussion with crew]
End of SR #2825
End of SR #2825
Enter the timecode: