Advocates; Would Justice Be Served Better if a Jury Didnt Have to be Unanimous to Convict Someone?
Part of The Advocates.
Moderator: Michael Dukakis Advocate: Evan Semerjian Advocate: James Hill Witnesses: Jacob Tanzer Solicitor General, Oregon 1969-71 Keith Mossman American Bar Association Prof. Samuel Dash Georgetown University Law Center Melvin Belli Attorney, San Francisco
More material is available from this program at the WGBH Archive. If you are a researcher interested in accessing the collection at WGBH, please email email@example.com.
Untranscribed item: Request Transcription
- Would Justice Be Served Better if a Jury Didnt Have to be Unanimous to Convict Someone?
- Program Number
- Series Description
A SERIES OF DEBATES with a moderator facilitating the discussion of national and international issues - using advocates who would introduce witnesses to support their point of view. Debates recorded at Boston's Faneuil Hall. Moderators included: Michael Dukakis; Marilyn Berger; Michael Harrington, Robert Maynard. (Premiered October, 1969; conceived by Prof. Roger Fisher.) Other participants included Barney Frank, Avi Nelson, Antonin Scalia, S.I. Hayakawa, Paul Simon, Albert Shankar, Richard Bolling, Pete McCloskey, Chester Crocker, John Anderson, Elmo Zumwalt, George Ball, John Kenneth Galbraith, William Colby, Eleanor Smeal, Phyllis Schlafly, Sam Ervin, Laurence Tribe, Daniel Schorr, Orrin Hatch, Morris Udall, Edward Kennedy, George McGovern, Jake Garn, Paul Tsongas, Alan Dershowitz. Series release date: 1969
- Asset Type
- Media Type
- Dukakis, Michael S. (Michael Stanley), 1933-
- Semerjian, Evan
- Hill, J. D. (James D.)
- Dash, Samuel
- Tanzer, Jacob
- Belli, Melvin M., 1907-1996
- Georgetown University
- Social Issues
- Public Affairs
- Dash, Samuel (Guest)
- Semerjian, Evan (Guest)
- Hill, James (Guest)
- Mossman, Keith (Guest)
- Belli, Melvin (Guest)
- Dukakis, Michael (Moderator)
- Tanzer, Jacob (Guest)
- Publication Information
- Supported by a grant from the Open Society Foundations.
- Chicago: “Advocates; Would Justice Be Served Better if a Jury Didnt Have to be Unanimous to Convict Someone?,” 11/09/1972, WGBH Media Library & Archives, accessed February 16, 2019, http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_73914A7DBB0F4A37A089A106F016C357.
- MLA: “Advocates; Would Justice Be Served Better if a Jury Didnt Have to be Unanimous to Convict Someone?.” 11/09/1972. WGBH Media Library & Archives. Web. February 16, 2019. <http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_73914A7DBB0F4A37A089A106F016C357>.
- APA: Advocates; Would Justice Be Served Better if a Jury Didnt Have to be Unanimous to Convict Someone?. Boston, MA: WGBH Media Library & Archives. Retrieved from http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_73914A7DBB0F4A37A089A106F016C357